Likewise, the right to vote has a similar obligation. Political parties would have a need and an incentive to spend millions—perhaps even billions—more on campaigns since they would need to reach millions of additional, low-information voters.
However, only one person casts a vote because that person is the only one certain of one specific theory. Many individuals claim that voting is a civic duty shared by all who live under one government, but this is not the case. By having those figures available, the government will know for sure exactly how many votes each party has acquired for the election, leaving no room for error in the event of undecided voters.
The arguments against claim that forcing individuals to cast ballots against their will can lead to empty votes, or donkey votes. There is no evidence that requiring people to vote provides sufficient incentive for them to gain the information necessary to cast an informed ballot.
The decision not to vote is therefore a rational one for those who have not put in the time or effort to discern which electoral choice is best for them or their country.
Votes should be cast by individuals who strongly believe in the people they vote for, not by individuals who vote because they have no other choice. If everybody voted, it would completely change the political map in this country.
Compulsory voting violates civil liberties — The government and politicians serve the people, not the other way around. William Galston, senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution.
Currently, political campaigns spend a lot of money targeting likely voters and getting them to the polls. Why Compulsory Voting is Wrong Many arguments exist to prove or disprove the importance of compulsory voting.
The arguments for compulsory voting state that there cannot be a fair election if groups of people fail to cast their ballots.
Many people choose not to vote because they are disengaged from or apathetic about politics. While citizens may exercise their civil rights free speech, marriage, etc. Some consider the fining of recalcitrant voters to be more oppressive still. It would be transformative if everybody voted — that would counteract money more than anything.
For this reason, arguments in favor demand the enforcement of compulsory voting to ensure full participation for fair elections.
For this reason, many individuals choose not to vote because they are uncertain of their choices or harbor equal faith for all parties on the ballot.
While there may be some benefits of mandatory voting, counteracting the amount of money in politics is not one of them.Jan 19, · Voting Should Be Mandatory — that compulsory voting violates free speech ideals that include the right to silence — misunderstands how compulsory voting works.
Voters are not compelled to. The Arguments For Compulsory Voting Politics Essay. Print Reference this. Published: 23rd March, this paper analyzes whether or not compulsory voting is consistent with the fundamental principles of democracy.
We can help with your essay Find out more. Should Voting Be Made Compulsory in Britain? Essay; Should Voting Be Made Compulsory in Britain? Essay. Words Mar 25th, 8 Pages.
Show More. Politics & Economics Should voting be made compulsory in Britain? Britain currently employs a voluntary voting system, whereby it is entirely up to the individual to choose whether to vote or not.
Should Voting Be Compulsory? Universal voting would help fill the vacuum in participation by evening out disparities stemming from income, education and age.
should voting in national. Compulsory voting is wrong and should not be forced on anyone. Voting is a right, not a duty, and the only votes that carry any weight are the votes cast by confident voters who stand behind their decisions.
Voting should not be compulsory in Australia” Popular participation is often cited as one of the fundamental principles of democracy. The right to vote being a freedom that has, and continues to be, sought after by people all over the world.Download