WHYN Editors apply notability standards to all subjects to determine whether the English language Wikipedia should have a separate, stand-alone article on that subject. Do related topics provide needed context? Restaurants in New York City. Fringe theoriesfor example, may merit standalone pages but have undue weight on a page about the mainstream concept.
For ideas on how to deal with material that may be best handled by placing it in another article, see WP: Sometimes, understanding is best achieved by presenting the material on a dedicated standalone page, but it is not required that we do so.
When a standalone page is created, it can be spun off from a broader page. We require editors to use their judgment about how to organize subjects so that we have neither long, bloated articles nor articles so narrow that they cannot be properly developed.
Other times, when many similar notable topics exist, it is impractical to collect them into a single page, because the resulting article would be too unwieldy.
Sometimes, several related topics, each of them similarly notable, can be collected into a single page, where the relationships between them can be better appreciated than if they were each a separate page as at Music of the Final Fantasy VII series.
Sometimes, when information about a future event is scarce, coverage may instead be better suited to a larger encompassing article see also Wikipedia: We require the existence of at least one secondary source so that the article can comply with Wikipedia: What sourcing is available now?
There are other times when it is better to cover notable topics, that clearly should be included in Wikipedia, as part of a larger page about a broader topic, with more context. Every snowflake is unique and Wikipedia: Wikipedia is a digital encyclopediaand so the amount of content and details should not be limited by concerns about space availability.
We require multiple sources so that we can write a reasonably balanced article that complies with Wikipedia: Editorial judgment goes into each decision about whether or not to create a separate page, but the decision should always be based upon specific considerations about how to make the topic understandable, and not merely upon personal likes or dislikes.
Why we have these requirements WP: For example, editors normally prefer to merge information about translations of books into the larger subject of the original book, because in their editorial judgment, the merged article is more informative and more balanced for readers and reduces redundant information in the encyclopedia.
A decision to cover a notable topic only as part of a broader page does not in any way disparage the importance of the topic. The primary purpose of these standards is to ensure that editors create articles that comply with major content policies.
On the other hand, an article may be a stub even though many sources exist, but simply have not been included yet.
Subject-specific notability guidelines and WikiProject advice pages may provide information on how to make these editorial decisions in particular subject areas. Summary styleWikipedia: Other times, standalone pages are well justified as with President of the United States as well as standalone biographies of every individual President.
If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page, but should instead be merged into an article about a larger topic or relevant list. One should particularly consider due and undue weight.
Does other information provide needed context? We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic.On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article.
Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Wikipedia's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid indiscriminate.
) If you’ve been asked to submit a paper in MLA style, your instructor is asking you to format the page and present the content in a specific way.
Just as football referees dress a certain way, and Japanese chefs cook a certain way, writers in certain disciplines follow a certain set of.Download